The Magazine for Crime & Mystery



Val McDermid Interview

Nevada Barr on writing HUNTING SEASON plus an excerpt

Paul Doherty's short story THE KYRIE MAN

Stark Contrasts Michael Carlson examines the pulp fiction of Richard Stark

Have you got what it takes to be a Writer? by Fiona Shoop


Richard Stark's Parker makes a Comeback

{short description of image}

by Michael Carlson

It is hard to imagine, in today's world where pulp fictions are fashion items, where amoral heroes are the rule rather than the exception, where lukewarm pastiches of the great seedy films and stories of the 40s and 50s turn into megahits and lifestyle trendsetters, just what sort of impact the Parker novels had when they appeared in the 1960s.
Richard Stark's series about a professional thief who specialised in often-complicated capers, grew out of the last gasps of the pulp world in the early 60s. This is the world of Jack Ruby's strip club, of men in narrow ties driving cars with big fins, of an underbelly to the otherwise complacent Eisenhower years. It is a world which the bright lights of the Kennedy years eventually blew away, a world which the suburban baby-boom generation didn't know existed.
By the time the movie POINT BLANK tossed that world into our faces, the Parker series was switching paperback publishers with confusing regularity, but also attracting a growing and fiercely loyal {short description of image}following. It was when those baby-boomers, raised on a diet of James Bond and I Spy, discovered the dark side of crime fiction that the Parker books took off. POINT BLANK, BONNIE AND CLYDE, EASY RIDER and other movies signalled the rise of the criminal as, if not hero, then star.
As this happened, it was also becoming general knowledge that Richard Stark was the pen name of Donald Westlake, the prolific novelist who was also producing comic mainstream novels, suspense novels, and a series of caper novels, starting with THE HOT ROCK, about the Dortmunder gang, a sort of Keystone Kops version of Parker's crews.
Not that it mattered. The blurbs of Parker paperbacks were unusual in that they could be believed. "Nobody tops Stark in his objective portrayal of a world of total amorality" said the New York Times. Unusually, The Times was both understated and correct. How much more hardboiled could the advertising on the covers of the Gold Medal editions be? "Parker steals. Parker kills. It's a living."
That blurb caught perfectly the tone of the best Parker stories, which is matter of fact, fast-paced, and ruthless. Despite the deft way Westlake can take a simple formula and improvise endlessly upon it, it is the character of Parker himself which makes the books work.
Parker (no first name) is a professional. He steals for a living, and he lives his life to facilitate that function. Once he is engaged in a job, Parker's attitude toward his fellow humans becomes one of almost total psychotic detachment, yet he is no psychotic. He is not totally human, either, at least not after the plastic surgery he receives in the second novel. But other humans are often mere props, obstacles, difficulties, which need to be overcome or removed. If he needs information, and the person who has it decides to play tough, Parker will respond with torture. Not because he enjoys it, but because he is not playing a role.

Parker can show human qualities. He will joke with his partners, not because he finds the joke funny, but because he knows this sort of behaviour is what they expect and it will put them at ease. He can show just enough affection to a woman to keep her from becoming an emotional problem. But in general, he has no interest in women while he's on a job. But he does feel a need immediately after one. Did I say psychopath?
As a professional, Parker also has a certain honour, a moral code as well developed as that of Hammett's Continental Op. But he works in a business whose currency is betrayal, and double-cross fuels many of the Parker novels.
Westlake maintained this hard-edged, flat, fast-paced tone through almost all the 16 Parker novels he produced between 1962 and 1973. Although he struck gold with the Dortmunder books (and their movies) Parker had achieved cult status, and that status has been maintained ever since. So it comes as a surprise that, a year after the American publication of the first Parker novel in 24 years, COMEBACK is still unpublished in Britain, and in fact, Alison & Busby, the UK publisher of the Parker series, had been unaware of it when it was published in the States.
{short description of image} COMEBACK is classic Parker. The rip-off is a big one: the box-office takings of a Christian crusade. The plan has its little twist of absurdity: a crook dressed as an angel. There is the usual element of the heist which seems ridiculously obvious in retrospect, and makes you wonder why you didn't think of a robbery like that yourself. And of course there is betrayal, and when you double-cross Parker, you soon learn you shouldn't.
There are a couple of changes that two and half decades have wrought. We have a kinder, gentler Parker now. He actually seems to enjoy himself when he plays an amusing role, and occasionally he evinces signs of humanity that would've worried him way back then. And he's also a more politically correct Parker. His long-suffering woman, Claire, has now become part of his crew, and is a capable 90s liberated woman, rather than the sit-at-home partner waiting for Parker to come home and revert back to his "human" persona after a job. But nothing has changed with Stark's spare prose. It may be a little richer than it was, but maybe after all these years it's hard for Westlake to revert to his schizophrenic persona again (and let's not even talk about Tucker Coe!). Perhaps, like Parker, he's mellowing. Whether he is or isn't, let's hope Stark has a few more novels left in him, and that someone sees fit to publish them in this country.


The variations in titles are usually the result of changing publishers. A couple (MADE IN USA and THE SPLIT) reflect movie titles based on the original novels.

THE MAN WITH THE GETAWAY FACE (aka THE STEEL HIT) 1963man with the getaway face
the outfit THE MOURNER 1963
(I would assume that the first four books were sold as a package, originally published by Pocket Books, they were reissued (and two retitled) out of sequence by Berkeley.
POINT BLANK opens with a double-cross, with Parker left for dead and evetually arrested for vagrancy, his only fall. The double- crosser sets himself up with "the outfit", so when Parker gets his revenge he also incurs the wrath of the organisation, and the next two novels match Parker v organised crime, with no bets on who wins. THE MOURNER uses a gun from THE OUTFIT to tie Parker into a story which is a take off on THE MALTESE FALCON).
THE SCORE (aka KILLTOWN) 1964 Parker robs an entire town.
RUN LETHAL 1966 (In 1967 Gold Medal picked up the series and tried to market it with titles designed to appeal to the MAN FROM UNCLE/MATT HELM audience which was huge at that time. The four novels which follow are very similarly structured caper novels, with the targets changing the formula slightly, and Parker acting out of character in the fourth.
THE RARE COIN SCORE 1967 {short description of image}
THE SOUR LEMON SCORE 1969 Parker shows compassion to a double-crosser!
PLUNDER SQUAD 1972 Parker's compassion comes back to haunt him.
As Stark, Westlake also wrote four novels featuring Alan Grofield, an underemployed actor in the "legitimate" stage makes his first appearance in KILLTOWN. Grofield supplements his meagre acting income by working as a thief. In RUN LETHAL, Parker rescues him from an island in the Gulf of Mexico after he's wounded during a heist in a gambling casino. Parker leaves him in Mexico, which is where the first Grofield novel THE DAMSEL begins. The second Grofield book, THE BLACKBIRD, begins with the same scene that starts SLAY GROUND: an armoured car heist which goes wrong when a shaky driver crashes the getaway car. Parker and Grofield go their separate ways and get their separate stories! The other Grofield novels are THE DAME and LEMONS NEVER LIE.
I've always thought Grofield was part of the inspiration for Lawrence Block's Bernie Rhodenbarr. Block has been the most successful schizoid crime writer since Westlake, with his tales of Matt Scudder alternating with the light comedy of Rhodenbarr. It is also worth noting that Joe Gores' skip-tracer, Dan Kearney, appears in PLUNDER SQUAD. That appearance was also chronicled in Gores' first DKA novel, DEAD SKIP, which may be the first cross-over appearance by series characters from other writer's novels.
{short description of image}{short description of image}POINT BLANK dir: John Boorman (Lee Marvin, Angie Dickinson, KeenanWynn, Carroll O'Connor, Lloyd Bochner, John Vernon) One of the key movies of the 60s, POINT BLANK turns film noir in on itself, with a doomed hero/villain whose violence is the essence of his existence. It is interesting that foreign directors made the first two movies taken from Stark's books: perhaps seeing more in the portrayal of the underbelly of America than the US audience itself. It should be said that what Boorman saw was both the unrepressed violence and the repressed homosexuality of the Parker character: if you want to draw a conclusion you're free to. Parker (here called Walker) is betrayed by his partner (here renamed Reese and played by John Vernon). In a party scene, Walker and Reese roll around on the floor in a barely concealed parody of love-making; the point is reinforced when we later see Walker in a woman's bathrobe applying makeup to his face (to cover a bruise). The film's ending is also classic, with Marvin trapped in the shadows of Alcatraz, too wary to approach the money left for him by Keenan Wynn (and perhaps dying as he watches it). The sniper, by the way, was played by James B Sikking, who reprised the role ironically in Hill Street Blues.
MADE IN USA 1967 dir: Jean-Luc Goddard (Jean-Pierre Leaud, Anna Karina) The screenplay, by Goddard, says it's based on THE JUGGER, but you'll have a hard time trying to figure out how. With characters called Richard Widmark, Donald Siegel, and David Goodis, and killers named Richard Nixon and Robert McNamara, Goddard appeared to be drawing a link between the America portrayed in the film noir/pulp fiction which the French love, and the real America, the one which was engaged in the Vietnam war and involved in the assassinations of leaders like JFK and Ben Baraka. "This is like a Disney film, but one that stars Humphrey Bogart," was Karina's take on it, but remember, this was the Sixties .
THE SPLIT 1968 dir: Gordon Flemyng (Jim Brown, Diahann Carroll, Julie Harris, Ernest Borgnine, Gene Hackman, Jack Klugman, James Whitmore, Donald Sutherland, Warren Oates Parker meets blaxploitation! This isn't a great movie, but it's an interesting one, partly because Jim Brown brings a different sort of amorality to the role, and partly because the supporting cast is so good, including early turns by Oates, Sutherland, and Hackman. Borgnine is particularly over-the-top, trying to manhandle Brown in an eerie echo of POINT BLANK.

THE OUTFIT 1974 dir: John Flynn (Robert Duvall, Joe Don Baker, Robert Ryan, Karen Black, Richard Jaekel, Sheree North, Joanna Cassidy, Marie Windsor One of the most underrated and neglected crime films of the 70s, and one of the best. Flynn catches both the atmosphere of Parker's world, which is, after all, an underworld, and the tone of the Stark novels, which is basically businesslike. Duvall matches Marvin in his portrayal. Where Marvin always suggests violence about to explode out of control, Duvall (here called Macklin) catches Parker's essence, where violence is a tool. But there is also the sense that Macklin sees people as objects put in the way of a successful job, and they need to be dealt with as such. In the novel, there's a wonderful scene where Parker admires a woman in bed, just after a hitman has tried to kill him. "She was a good animal" he thinks. Duvall's relationship with Karen Black in this film is drawn in much the same way, but actually deepens slightly, as Duvall starts to humanise the character slightly.
This was, I believe, Robert Ryan's last role, and one of his best, as the crime boss who simply wants Macklin out of the way.
SLAYGROUND 1984 dir: Terry Bedford (Peter Coyote, Billie Whitelaw, Mel Smith, Philip Sayer) This opens very well, with the famous car crash that ruins the armoured car job, but it drifts all over the place after that, winding up in a Britain at a seaside funhouse. Go figure. Coyote is surprisingly good in a role that on the surface seems totally miscast. Billie Whitelaw makes a welcome appearance, and Mel Smith turns in a performance reprised by Robbie Coltrane in Neil Jordan's MONA LISA. The theory about foreigners understanding Stark's America better falls to pieces with this turkey.

dvd{short description of image}PAYBACK 1999 dir: Brian Helgeland (Mel Gibson, Gregg Henry, Lucy Alexis Liu, James Coburn Mel Gibson told interviewers he wanted to play a character who was 'morally reprehensible', but of course in Parker's world, he's actually the least reprehensible character around, because he is always honest within his own frame of reference. It's more likely that Gibson saw a chance to play a tough guy in a T-shirt as a way of doing for his career what Bruce Willis had done with DIE HARD and then PULP FICTION, and broaden his type. In any event, his character (here called Porter-I don't know why they never just call him Parker, but there you are) starts out tough but is softened considerably along the way. Part of this apparently was a studio or Gibsonian reaction to the hard edges which came through in Gibson's original portrayal; give him credit, he doesn't start out trying to be glamorous. But, as the story goes, director Helgeland refused to re-shoot some scenes to allow Gibson to make his character more likeable, so he was fired and the new scenes were reshot by Paul Abascol, whose previous occupation was hairdresser to Mel Gibson. Helgeland did a nice job of abstracting Porter's world: he seems to be operating in the same New York used for the Shadow movie, and it is strangely atemporal. One key plot element even involves the use of a rotary phone-cars seem to be 1960s, which is the era of the novel, but otherwise the city seems almost futuristic. And the Uzi wielding Chinese gangs are right out of the 90s. There are subtle changes in the other main characters as well. Porter's wife moves from being a pill head to a junkie, and her death from a heroin OD is more chilling, perhaps more self-induced, and certainly creates more motivation for Porter to chase down his ex-partners. Where Parker was helped by one of the syndicate bosses in the novel, in the film Porter is both helped and pursued by two corrupt cops, a nicely done creation. And here Porter calls on an old hooker/girlfriend for help; he once was her 'driver'. It's hard to think of Stark's Parker pimping or driving for whores. The other main change is in his double-crossing partner, here called Mal Resnick again. Gregg Henry has a field day playing Mal as a masochistic creep, who enjoys taking a beating from Lucy Liu (again giving mainstream America a cheap sexual thrill, as she did with lesbian scenes in Ally McBeal-being freed, as it were, from her more painful bondage to TV's palp). The undertone of homosexual bonding from Boorman's film is gone, subsumed beneath Mal's 'kinkier' perversion. We're left to wonder why Porter ever trusted this bozo in the first place. There are lots of other things to like in Payback, including James Coburn's performance in the role originally played by Caroll O'Connor. But because a Mel Gibson vehicle can't afford to bury his 'star' quality beneath the lean, boring workaday world of Parker the thief, the essence of Stark never really seeps through. The novel The Hunter ends with Paker escaping the cops, only to discover he's grabbed the wrong suitcase and left his loot behind. Although that's really his own fault, he decides to blame the syndicate, and decides he will hit them to get his money back (Westlake would reprise that revenge motive later in the series). Where Point Blank ended with death and ambiguity, here Porter gets the dough, and the girl, and a car to make his getaway. Parker's life is rarely so simple, or so sweet.

{short description of image}